Friday, May 27, 2011

The fascinating op-ed, How to Improve Teacher Quality? Treat Teachers as Individuals, offers a compelling retrofit of the seemingly age-old teacher quality debate. Teachers, Rick Hess and his co-authors say, should be treated as individuals with particular strengths and gifts. The current way that the job of teaching is structured does not just ignore this important and sensible recommendation, but it actually makes it impossible to put into effect. Teachers do many jobs rolled into one in a work environment that does not facilitate communication or collaboration between colleagues. Instead of trying to make the wonderfully human teacher fit the impossible job description, let’s change the job description.

NCTAF has championed for years, through research and action projects, the idea that stand-and-deliver teaching requires the kind of heroism that no one individual possesses. The education workforce needs to be redesigned because the education system itself needs to be organized differently, so that schools can become fluid learning organizations. Hess et al effectively make this case, enjoining educators to look at new ways of working together. This article adds to the growing conversation about how to reinvent teaching!

2 comments:

  1. Why doesn't this very reasonable analysis of the problems with American public education get anywhere near as much mainstream attention as the largely irrelevant(charters) and perennially unworkable (accountability) things we seem to endlessly argue about?

    This article and NCTAF's broader work clearly proves that not every idea outside the mainstream is radical ----and that we certainly would benefit from re-inventing the profession instead of measuring it against increasingly exacting standards.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your comments and nuanced appreciation for these not-so-radical ideas. I have one comment on your comment. I don't think it is the "exacting" nature of the standards that is the problem, so much as their irrelevance. Let me explain. It is not that teachers and educators should not be held accountable--they should--but it is both the narrow ways in which accountability is measured and the fact that the whole accountability movement (and its cousin the merit pay movement)is inherently punitive. This "comply, or else..." mentality works aggressively at cross purposes with what many education reformers/transformers are trying to do--increase the quality of teaching, improve the teaching profession. Threats don't generally lead to creative improvement, but rather they breed fear, confusion, and stopgap solutions.

    ReplyDelete