Many thanks to John Merrow for not accepting the overly simplistic
argument that because increased use of technology in school doesn’t appear to
yield increases in test scores, then technology is not worth the big bucks
schools are spending on it. The central tenet of Merrow’s rebuttal of the
September 4 New York Times article is right on: “Schools spend billions on technology but use
it to do the same old stuff in more entertaining ways!” says Merrow. He is absolutely right that this issue, which
really boils down to a discussion of how to modernize pedagogy and curriculum,
needs much more attention.
NCTAF has long understood that technology in and
of itself does little if it is not used as a means to new and evolving ends. It
is what you do with the technology,
not the technology itself that matters. We’ve learned this important lesson
again and again in our Teachers
Learning in NetworkedCommunities (TLINC ®) project, which we have
been implementing at colleges of education across the country for more than
five years. Designed to address the significant need to curb the high turnover
among teachers and to leverage technology in teacher preparation, TLINC gives
new teachers a strong start by inducting them into linked professional learning
communities that blend face-to-face and online collaboration. Over the life of
the project, we’ve used any number of online platforms, and have had to
intentionally work at separating the particular technology du jour (which
sometimes poses challenges) from the content and the concepts of the program.
The technology is a tool, but it’s the goal—in this case integration of
technology-enabled mentoring and collaboration—that we’re after. And it’s just
this distinction that John Merrow is urging educators and education advocates
to focus on.
The most important lesson from the TLINC project, however, is the
largely unaddressed need to integrate technology into teacher education.
If we expect teachers to innovate and take full advantage of technology’s
power— to do new things in new ways— then we must prepare them to do so from
the moment they enter their teacher preparation programs. Traditionally, no one
expected student teachers to magically know everything about pedagogical
theory—that’s why they needed training. Why then are we surprised that teachers
cannot keep up when technology that demands a shift in pedagogy comes along?
And I do not mean that we need to train teachers to use Google or to use
GarageBand. We need to teach teachers to help students recognize appropriate
sources, so that they can conduct content-rich original research and drive
their own learning. Technology fundamentally changes how everyone, especially
children, can access information and process it. We need to work with teacher
educators to help schools keep up.
No comments:
Post a Comment